Texas Floods Illustrate FEMA’s Mismanagement
By now, you’ve likely heard of the flash floods that killed more than 120 people in Texas. But as more reporting has emerged about FEMA’s response to the disaster, it is worth taking a moment to illustrate how Trump’s cuts will have an immediate impact on the most basic ways we engage with the government. While Trump promised that cuts to the agency would make it more nimble and better able to respond to disasters, unsurprisingly, the exact opposite has happened.
The single change that most delayed FEMA’s response to the floods is a new policy that requires Kristi Noem, the rootin’-tootin’-dog-shootin’ head of the Department of Homeland Security (which oversees, among other things, ICE and FEMA), to personally approve any expenses greater than $100,000. FEMA’s budget is more than $30 billion, and disaster aid is inherently expensive, so this caused serious issues. For example, as CNN reported, FEMA usually pre-positions search and rescue teams near imminent disaster zones. But Noem didn’t authorize FEMA’s deployment of the rescuers for more than 72 hours after the flooding began.
Another example: after a disaster, thousands of people access aid by calling FEMA help centers. On July 5, the day after flooding began, FEMA answered 3,018 of the 3,027 calls from disaster survivors. But the New York Times reported that on that evening, Noem did not renew the agreements with the contractors who handle the vast majority of calls. That meant that on July 6, FEMA received 2,363 calls and answered only 846, and on the ...