More than two-thirds of the Fortune 500 list are incorporated in the tiny state, and the rest of us have been living with the consequences.
Now, most of the well-known companies incorporated in Delaware—Google, Amazon, Meta, etc.—are corporations, not LLCs, so this anonymity provision doesn’t apply to them. (They receive their own benefits for registering there, which we’ll get into later.) Limited Liability Companies don’t have shareholders and can’t sell stock, so they’re often associated with small businesses: boutique stores, wedding photographers, local restaurant chains. That doesn’t mean an LLC can’t handle enormous sums of money, though. And the most enthusiastic exploiters of the anonymous-incorporation-loophole are far from mom-and-pop establishments.
In 2009, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak established 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a sovereign wealth fund intended for making investments abroad in order to ease poverty at home. Instead, Razak and several associates laundered billions of dollars using a web of offshore bank accounts and shell companies—including eight anonymous LLCs incorporated in Delaware. The money was spent on luxury properties in Beverly Hills, New York, and London, diamonds, a 300-foot superyacht, fine art by Monet and Van Gogh, and, ironically, the financing of Hollywood films like The Wolf of Wall Street.
The criminal case is still highly active, with multiple ongoing trials, and only last week the Justice Department announced that it had recovered an additional $6 million in laundered funds. Some key players have been sentenced, including Razak, but because the entities were anonymously registered, it has been exceptionally difficult for investigators to trace all of the culprits. Government officials have called it the world’s "largest kleptocracy case to date.” Yet almost none of the major reporting on the scheme acknowledges Delaware’s role.
Hal Weitzman, author of What’s the Matter with Delaware?: How the First State Has Favored the Rich, Powerful, and Criminal―and How It Costs Us All, explains that while the 1MDB case was historic in terms of money embezzled, Delaware’s “pro-business” practices have also had a devastating human toll.
One of the most disturbing examples involves Backpage.com: a now-defunct classified ad website, similar to Craigslist, that was best known for selling sex. Over 90 percent of Backpage’s revenue was generated by its adult-services section, which basically operated as a prostitution platform. The site was also discovered to be facilitating the trafficking of minors. Backpage was incorporated in Delaware—and despite lawsuits alleging child abuse beginning in 2011, the company remained in good standing with the state for seven more years, until federal authorities finally seized the forum.
In a University of Chicago podcast, Weitzman explained:
“At its height, Backpage was involved in three-quarters of the child trafficking reports received by the National Center For Missing And Exploited Children. This was a Delaware registered company, that even months after it was shut down by federal law enforcement in 2018, was still considered to be in good standing by the Delaware Secretary of State’s office, because they’d paid their annual fees.
So there’s a case of human trafficking. There are cases of money laundering, of arms trafficking, of drugs trafficking, all not going through Delaware, but all using Delaware businesses. And as I say, with the protection of the United States law.
It’s a way to dress up bad behavior. It puts a business suit and tie on activities like money laundering and drug trafficking by saying, “Well, we have a Delaware LLC. How more legitimate could you be?”
Other beneficiaries of Delaware’s lenient laws include international arms dealer Viktor Bout, nicknamed the "Merchant of Death.” (You might remember him as the Russian prisoner who was exchanged for WNBA player Brittner Griner in 2022. He was also the inspiration for Nicholas Cage’s character in Lords of War.) Bout used at least a dozen shell companies in Delaware to finance his activities, resulting in a 2008 federal indictment for “conspiracy to kill American citizens, acquire and use antiaircraft missiles and supply material to terrorists,” writes the New York Times.
In the wake of Bout’s arrest, Senator Carl Levin of Michigan tried repeatedly to pass the Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act, which would have required Delaware to collect information on the people behind companies, and provide that information to law enforcement upon request. The bill failed repeatedly, as Delaware and other incorporation-friendly states argued it would burden businesses. It wasn’t until 2021, over a decade later, that Congress finally passed the Corporate Transparency Act, which mandated that companies report their owners to the federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, instead of to state offices.
Wouldn’t you know it, though, the Trump Administration recently announced that it will simply be ignoring that bill. (Only in the case of American citizens.) In March 2025, a Treasury Department press release announced:
The Treasury Department is announcing today that, with respect to the Corporate Transparency Act, not only will it not enforce any penalties or fines … under the existing regulatory deadlines, but it will further not enforce any penalties or fines against U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after the forthcoming rule changes take effect either. The Treasury Department will further be issuing a proposed rulemaking that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.
“This is a victory for common sense,” said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent. “Today’s action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy.”
Yay for small American businesses! Like Backpage.com and Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman who conducted his tax evasion scheme using nine Delaware companies! (Of course, Manafort was pardoned by Trump in 2020 anyway.)
Again, not all companies incorporated in Delaware are laundering money and trafficking weapons (or children). Most of the state's corporate residents are household names, like Google, Amazon, Meta, Walmart, Coca-Cola, and thousands of others. Some of them might be linked to labor abuse in different ways, but the biggest draw for these corporations isn’t anonymity. It’s Delaware's Court of Chancery: a specialized business court that hears corporate cases without juries.
Supporters argue that the system creates predictability and expertise, by using highly specialized judges who only deal with corporate disputes. Personally, I am icked out by the idea of corporate lawyers and judges developing a body of law that is completely insulated from ordinary citizens, but that’s just me. And the impacts of these cases don’t remain sequestered in Delaware: decisions made by a handful of state judges routinely shape the behavior of some of the largest companies on Earth. In one famous case, Disney shareholders sued the company after former president Michael Ovitz was paid a severance package worth roughly $140 million, despite having worked there for barely a year. The dispute was decided not by a jury of regular people, but by the Court of Chancery, who ruled in Disney's favor—setting a precedent for boardrooms across the country.
Admittedly, though, it’s not always sunshine and roses for CEOs. Some executives have been left distraught by the decisions of the Delaware court, like Elon Musk, who in 2022 attempted to walk away from his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, mid-deal (possibly realizing that he’d miscounted the zeroes while high on ketamine?). Twitter sued in the state, and after Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick blocked Musk's attempts to derail the proceedings, he was forced to fold before trial. Four years earlier, the same judge struck down Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation package, the largest executive pay deal in corporate history, after concluding that the company's board had been too cozy with its celebrity CEO.
In response, Musk threw a very revealing tantrum. Delaware had failed to deliver the outcome he expected from a place meant to cater to corporations, so the billionaire launched a public campaign urging companies to flee the state. Soon after, Tesla reincorporated in Texas. Most major companies have stayed put, but if corporate America starts to agree that Delaware is no longer accommodating enough, businesses won’t suddenly become less powerful. Instead, other states will compete to become even more accommodating.
Lo and behold, after Musk re-incorporated in Texas, the state created its own specialized business court, which lawyers describe as “dethroning Delaware.” The Lone Star state also passed legislation making it harder for shareholders to sue directors, in an explicit ploy to lure companies.
For decades, Delaware’s pro-business practices have resulted in a national race to the bottom. The most egregious example, which likely affects you personally, took place in 1981, when Delaware rewrote its banking laws in order to attract major financial institutions. According to Weitzman, state officials at the time secretly worked alongside major New York bank executives to craft legislation that allowed lenders to charge limitless interest rates.
The reason this mattered has to do with a Supreme Court case called Marquette National Bank v. First Omaha Service Corp. In 1978, the Court ruled that nationally chartered banks could charge the interest rate permitted in their home state, even when lending to customers elsewhere. Suddenly, states that attempted to cap interest rates found themselves competing against lenders in Delaware. Banks migrated there in droves, and today, four of the nation's five largest credit issuers are incorporated in the state: JPMorgan Chase, Capital One, Bank of America, and Citigroup.
Before 1981, nearly all states had strict laws that capped interest rates of credit cards and loans at somewhere between 12 to 18 percent. After Delaware took advantage of the Marquette ruling, even attempts by Congress to set the cap at 36 percent have failed. If you’re struggling to buy a house today, no matter where in the country, you might have Delaware’s 1981 Republican Governor Pierre S. du Pont IV to thank. (Yes, the same du Ponts of the DuPont corporation, a Delaware-based company known for its toxic releases, worker deaths, and production of "forever chemicals.")
This is what makes a single 90-mile-long stretch of land along the East Coast so damn difficult to escape. A state with fewer residents than Dallas has managed to write rules that affect virtually every American. Delaware built an economy out of convincing businesses to exist there on paper, resulting in a place whose largest export is chemicals and whose largest import is corporations: essentially, a tiny America on steroids.
If we are serious about confronting corporate power in America, it’s time we stop letting corporations shop for the legal system they like best. Requiring companies to incorporate where they are actually headquartered would be a good start. At the very least, it would spare the rest of the country from having its corporate laws dictated by a state that takes less time to drive through than the average Joe Rogan podcast.